Derecho Jurisdiccional Disciplinario

Derecho jurisdiccional disciplinario, desde un enfoque ético, deontológico y preventivo 161 Bixby, M, (2010), “The Lion Awakens. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 to 2010”, 12 San Diego Int´l L.J. 89. Bock, D. (2013) “Compliance y deberes de vigilancia en la empresa” en AAVV, “Com- pliance y teoría del derecho penal”, Madrid. Chen, y. C., Chen, P. C., Hwang, J. J., Korba, L., Ronggong, S., & Yee, G. (2005). An analysis of online gaming crime characteristics. Internet Research, 15(3). Cinelli, V, y Manrique Gan, A, “El uso de programas de análisis predictivo en la inte- ligencia policial: una comparativa europea”, Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacio- nal, Vol. 5, No. 2, (2019), pp. 1-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18847/1.10.1. Committee of Experts on Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing and Different Forms of Artificial Intelligence (MSI-AUT): Draft Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems (26 June 2019) Cummings, M.L.: Automation Bias in Intelligent Time Critical Decision Support Sys- tems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2014). Available at: https:// web.archive.org/web/20141101113133/http: // web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/halab/papers/ CummingsAIAAbias.pdf Dewan, S.: Judges Replacing Conjecture with Formula for Bail. The New York Times (2015) European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ): European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment (2018). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-decem- ber-2018/16808f699c European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: #BigData: Discrimination in da- ta-supported decision making (2018). Gless, S., Silverman, E., Weigend, T.: If robots cause harm, who is to blame? Self-dri- ving cars and criminal liability. New Crim. Law Rev. 19(3) (2016).